Warning
01
Kuala Krai
Kelantan · Sungai Kelantan
22.8 m
Rising rapidly
Only 2.2 m until danger
Forecast 23.6 m in 6h (+0.8) · updated 4 min ago
Malaysia's Climate Today
01
A daily read on the country's climate — how hot, how wet, how clean the air, how high the rivers, and how far each of those sits from what used to be normal.
Updated Monday, 12 October 2026
Above the 1991–2020 average
+0.7°C
The national mean today is 26.9°C, against a historical normal of 26.2°C for this date. Every state is running warmer than its own average.
Temperature anomaly
Today in Malaysia
02
The country's climate at a glance — what the live feeds read today, and the forces behind them. Every tile links to the data underneath it.
Right now · live feeds
The wider picture
ERA5 reanalysis (ECMWF / Copernicus) via Open-Meteo · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Composed from the live temperature, rainfall and air-quality feeds.
Did you know
A “normal” is exactly thirty years long.
The World Meteorological Organization defines a climatological normal as a 30-year average, refreshed each decade. Every anomaly on this page is measured against the current one, 1991–2020.
World Meteorological Organization, WMO-No. 1203
Anomalies travel further than temperatures.
Absolute temperature changes sharply with altitude and distance from the coast, but the departure from normal stays similar across hundreds of kilometres. That is why climate records are kept as anomalies, not degrees.
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Reanalysis is not a forecast.
ERA5 runs a modern weather model over past observations, producing a physically consistent record of what the atmosphere actually did. It is the standard way to build a climate baseline where stations are sparse.
ECMWF / Copernicus Climate Change Service
Deep data
02.3
Most of this page is a live reading of a physical model constrained by satellites and stations. Some of it is not, and the difference matters more than any number on it. Every section carries a chip saying which it is.
Reference points
14
one per state, at its capital — not a station network
Baseline
1991–2020
ERA5 reanalysis · national mean 26.38°C, 2611 mm/yr
Feeds live
4 of 5
temperature, rainfall, air quality and UV. River levels are not
Baseline built
2026-07-08
35 years of daily ERA5, reduced offline to day-of-year normals
Temperature, rainfall and UV come from Open-Meteo, read at one point per state — the state capital. Anomalies are measured against a 1991–2020 ERA5 baseline we computed once, offline, from 35 years of daily reanalysis. Air quality is CAMS. River levels have no open feed anywhere, so they are the only illustrative figures here.
| Metric | Source | Points | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Open-Meteo forecast (ICON/GFS) | 14 | ≤15 min |
| Rainfall | Open-Meteo observed + ERA5 normals | 14 | ≤30 min |
| UV index | Open-Meteo daily maximum | 14 | ≤15 min |
| Air quality | CAMS (ECMWF) via Open-Meteo | 9 | hourly |
| Baseline (1991–2020) | ERA5 reanalysis (Copernicus) | 14 | Static |
| River levels | No open feed — illustrative | — | — |
Malaysia's own agencies — METMalaysia, DOE and JPS — publish this data on web pages rather than open APIs. Where an official feed exists (METMalaysia forecasts, via data.gov.my), it covers forecasts rather than the observations this page needs.
Fourteen points, not a network
One reference point per state, at its capital. That is enough to see a national anomaly and far too coarse to see a thunderstorm.
Reanalysis, not thermometers
ERA5 and CAMS are physical models pinned to observations. They are the standard tool for climate baselines, and they are not the reading on a station in Kuala Krai.
The gaps are the point
River levels are illustrative because nobody publishes them openly. A page that hid that would be worse than one that shows it.
ERA5 reanalysis (ECMWF / Copernicus) via Open-Meteo · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Climate Score
03
We compress heat, rainfall, air quality, flood risk and UV into a single daily stress index. Zero is a calm day; one hundred is a national emergency. The inputs are measured. The weights are ours.
31/ 100
Mild climate stress
Factor
Stress / 100
Heat
23
+0.7°C against the 1991–2020 baseline
Rainfall
3
96% of normal over the last 14 days
Air quality
71
0% of monitored city-dwellers in the Good band
Flood risk
42
Illustrative — no open flood telemetry exists
UV
40
midday UV index averages 8.4 across the country
State of Malaysia composite index, from live ERA5/CAMS factors · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
The inputs are measured; the weights and cutoffs are an editorial choice. The flood factor is illustrative.
Did you know
An air-quality index reports its worst pollutant, not its average.
Malaysia's API and the US AQI both take the maximum of the per-pollutant sub-indices. One bad pollutant sets the number; the other five vanish from the headline.
Department of Environment Malaysia; US Environmental Protection Agency
Weighting is a value judgement, not a technical step.
The OECD's handbook on composite indicators devotes a chapter to it. Whatever weights an index picks, it is asserting what matters — which is why ours are published in the table below.
OECD / JRC, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators (2008)
No body defines a national climate index.
Air quality has the AQI, drought has the SPI, and both are standardised internationally. A single number for a country's whole climate stress has no such standard — every one you meet was invented by whoever published it.
World Meteorological Organization
Deep data
03.3
Any index is an argument about what counts, dressed as a number. Four of the five factors are live measurements; the flood factor is not, and it carries a quarter of the weight. Here is the whole thing: the weight each factor holds, the reading behind it, and how many of the 31 points it contributes. Disagree with the weights and you get a different country.
Biggest driver
Flood risk
contributes 10.5 of the 31 points
Smallest driver
Rainfall
contributes just 0.6 points
Weights
Ours
heat 30% · flood 25% · rainfall 20% · UV 15% · air 10%
Flood factor
Illustrative
the one input with no open feed — it moves the score by a quarter
A 30-day history of the composite would need 30 days of every factor, and only temperature reaches that far back. So this is the heat factor alone — the largest single component, at 30% of the score — measured each day against that day's own 1991–2020 normal.
Each factor is normalised to 0–100, multiplied by its weight, and summed. The cutoffs are ours too: a +3°C anomaly counts as maximum heat stress, an AQI of 150 as maximum air stress. Reasonable people would pick different ones.
| Factor | Weight | Reading | Points of 31 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flood risk | 25% | illustrative index | 10.5 |
| Air quality | 10% | mean AQI 107 | 7.1 |
| Heat | 30% | +0.7°C anomaly | 6.9 |
| UV | 15% | UV index 8.4 | 6.0 |
| Rainfall | 20% | 96% of normal | 0.6 |
Weights are fixed; contributions move with the live readings, and sum to the composite.
State of Malaysia composite index · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Weights are published above so the index can be argued with.
Temperature
04
Every reading here is measured against the same day of the year in 1991–2020, so a hot July day is judged against other July days — not against the annual mean.
above the 1991–2020 average for this day of the year
Today
Historical average
Temperature anomaly
| State | Anomaly vs average |
|---|---|
| Sabahnow 25.9°C · high 31.8°C | +1.8°C |
| Peraknow 24.9°C · high 31.6°C | +1.5°C |
| Terengganunow 25.6°C · high 30.4°C | +1.0°C |
| Kedahnow 25.7°C · high 31.4°C | +0.8°C |
| Pahangnow 27.1°C · high 30.7°C | +0.8°C |
| Penangnow 25.1°C · high 31.6°C | +0.7°C |
| Kuala Lumpurnow 25.5°C · high 32.1°C | +0.7°C |
Open-Meteo forecast API (ICON / GFS blend) · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Did you know
Humans cool by evaporating sweat — until they cannot.
At a wet-bulb temperature of 35°C, sweat stops evaporating and the body cannot shed heat at any exertion. Laboratory work puts the practical limit lower still — nearer 30–31°C wet-bulb, even for young, healthy adults.
Sherwood & Huber (2010); Vecellio et al., J. Appl. Physiol. (2022)
Nights have warmed faster than days.
Across most regions, minimum temperatures rose faster than maximums through the twentieth century, narrowing the gap between day and night. It matters more than it sounds: a night that never cools is a night the body cannot recover from, and heat deaths follow the nights.
IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group I
A city makes its own climate.
Concrete and asphalt store the day's heat and release it after dark, so the urban heat island is strongest at night — exactly when the body needs the temperature to fall.
IPCC AR6 WG1, Ch. 10 (urban climate)
Deep data
04.3
What harms people is not the average — it is the count of days above 35°C, the nights that never fall below 26°C so the body cannot recover, and the humidity that turns 34.6°C into a felt 41.2°C. Cities make all three worse.
Days above 35°C
41
so far in 2026 · the 1991–2020 average for a full year is 17
Tropical nights
128
nights that never fell below 26°C · 71 in an average year
Peak heat index
41.2°C
what 34.6°C feels like at 74% humidity · 'danger' band
Longest hot streak
9 days
consecutive days above 35°C, ending 2 July
Each city against the rural stations that surround it, measured at the same hour. Concrete and traffic add up to a whole extra degree of warming in the Klang Valley.
| City | Urban | Rural | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kuala Lumpur | 34.2°C | 31.6°C | +2.6°C |
| Petaling Jaya | 33.8°C | 31.5°C | +2.3°C |
| George Town | 33.1°C | 31.2°C | +1.9°C |
| Johor Bahru | 32.9°C | 31.3°C | +1.6°C |
| Ipoh | 32.4°C | 31.1°C | +1.3°C |
| Kuching | 31.8°C | 30.9°C | +0.9°C |
Illustrative. A real version needs paired urban and rural station observations.
Today is hot, but nowhere near a record — and that is the point. These highs were once generational events; the anomaly above measures how ordinary that heat has become, not how extreme today is.
| State | Record | Set | Today is below by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perlis | 40.1°C | 9 Apr 1998 | 5.9°C |
| Perak | 39.4°C | 5 Apr 2016 | 6.8°C |
| Kuala Lumpur | 38.9°C | 16 Mar 2024 | 4.7°C |
| Kelantan | 38.6°C | 27 Apr 2016 | 8.0°C |
| Sarawak | 37.8°C | 12 Apr 1998 | 6.8°C |
| Sabah | 37.1°C | 3 May 2016 | 6.9°C |
Illustrative. METMalaysia's station archive has no open API.
Degrees of warming per decade since 1970. Kuala Lumpur is warming roughly 70% faster than Sabah — some of that is the climate, and some of it is the city itself.
| State | Warming per decade |
|---|---|
| Kuala Lumpur | +0.31°C |
| Selangor | +0.28°C |
| Penang | +0.26°C |
| Johor | +0.24°C |
| Perak | +0.23°C |
| Pahang | +0.21°C |
| Sarawak | +0.20°C |
| Sabah | +0.18°C |
Illustrative. A real version would come from Berkeley Earth's country series.
Illustrative figures — not measurements
Station records, urban-heat deltas and decadal trends are illustrative. METMalaysia's station archive has no open API.
Rainfall
05
Rain over the last fourteen days, against the rain those same fourteen days brought on average between 1991 and 2020. The national figure hides everything: the surplus is never spread evenly.
of normal rainfall over the last 14 days, nationwide
Daily rainfall
Normal for this date
Percent of normal
Vertical rule marks 100% — a typical fortnight
| State | Percent of normal |
|---|---|
| Selangor | 166% |
| Kedah | 141% |
| Perlis | 138% |
| Penang | 127% |
| Perak | 118% |
| Kelantan | 105% |
| Kuala Lumpur | 102% |
| Melaka | 79% |
ERA5 reanalysis (ECMWF / Copernicus) via Open-Meteo · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Observed rainfall from Open-Meteo; the normal is the 1991–2020 ERA5 mean for the same days at the same 14 points. Fourteen points are a thin sample of a country — JPS operates several hundred gauges, but publishes no open API.
Did you know
Warmer air holds about 7% more water for every degree.
The Clausius–Clapeyron relation. It is why the heaviest downpours intensify faster than average rainfall does: a warmer atmosphere has more to drop, all at once.
Clausius–Clapeyron relation; IPCC AR6 WG1
Malaysia has two monsoons — and two transitions between them.
The northeast monsoon runs roughly November to March and soaks the east coast; the southwest monsoon runs May to September and is drier. The inter-monsoon months between them are the stormiest.
METMalaysia
Malaysia is one of the most lightning-struck places on Earth.
The maritime continent — warm seas, narrow land, daily convection — makes this belt a global lightning capital. Strikes peak in the inter-monsoon transitions, when the air is unstable but the winds are too light to shear a storm apart, not at the height of either monsoon.
NASA LIS/OTD global lightning climatology
Deep data
05.3
A month's rain spread over a month drains away; the same rain in a day does not. These are the intensity measures — the heaviest 24 hours, how rare a fall that heavy is, and the index that decides whether a state is in drought or flood territory.
Heaviest 24 hours
218 mm
Gua Musang, Kelantan · a month's rain in a day
Wet days
11 of 14
days with ≥1 mm · the July norm is 7
Longest dry spell
6 days
Klang Valley, ending 5 July, while the east coast flooded
National SPI
+1.42
3-month standardised precipitation index · 'very wet'
A 25-year return period means a fall this heavy is expected roughly once in 25 years at that station. Gua Musang has now seen two since 2014.
| Station | Rain in 24h | Expected once every |
|---|---|---|
| Gua MusangKelantan | 218 mm | 25 yrs |
| Kuala KraiKelantan | 186 mm | 15 yrs |
| Hulu TerengganuTerengganu | 164 mm | 10 yrs |
| Kuala LipisPahang | 142 mm | 8 yrs |
| KapitSarawak | 131 mm | 5 yrs |
| Kota TinggiJohor | 108 mm | 3 yrs |
Illustrative. Return periods need a fitted extreme-value distribution on each station's full record.
The standardised precipitation index measures a state's rainfall against its own three-month history. Kelantan is extremely wet. Kuala Lumpur, 400km away, is moderately dry.
| State | Dry ← SPI → Wet | Band |
|---|---|---|
| Kelantan | +2.14 | Extremely wet |
| Terengganu | +1.86 | Very wet |
| Pahang | +1.52 | Very wet |
| Sarawak | +1.31 | Moderately wet |
| Johor | +0.94 | Moderately wet |
| Sabah | +0.61 | Near normal |
| Selangor | -0.42 | Near normal |
| Kuala Lumpur | -0.88 | Moderately dry |
Illustrative. Above +1.5 is very wet; below −1.0 is moderately dry.
Why · Southwest monsoon, week 6 of 18
The southwest monsoon normally dries the east coast. This year a stalled monsoon trough is holding moisture over Kelantan and Terengganu instead — the reason the rain is falling where it usually would not.
Illustrative figures — not measurements
Station 24-hour totals, return periods, SPI and the monsoon note are illustrative. JPS station telemetry has no open API.
Floods & Rivers
06
Most of the warnings sit in Kelantan and Terengganu, after two days of sustained rain over the northeast coast; the upper Rajang in Sarawak is climbing too. One honest caveat before the water: river levels are the only dataset on this page with no live feed — JPS publishes its telemetry as a web page, not an API — so this section is an illustration of the report a real feed would write, on real geography.
stations requiring attention
at warning level
at alert level
reporting normal
+17 stations above alert in the last 48 hours — still climbing, not receding.
All 412 gauges on one map: each state shaded by how many need attention, a dot for every monitored gauge, coloured by how close its river is to the bank. Hover a state — or a name on the right — to read its stations.
Kelantan
12 of 30
+8 more above alert in the full network.
Gauge status
Normal
Alert
Warning
Danger
State shading is how many gauges need attention; unshaded states are all normal.
Kelantan
12 of 30 need attention
+8 more in the full network — not in this sample.
Terengganu
8 of 29 need attention
Pahang
7 of 41 need attention
Sarawak
6 of 58 need attention
Johor
4 of 45 need attention
Sabah
3 of 47 need attention
Selangor
1 of 39 need attention
Perak
all 31 normal
6 further states and territories · 92 stations · all reporting normal.
Ranked by urgency — how close each river is to its danger threshold and how fast it is rising — so the ones to focus on first are at the top. Each carries its last 24 hours and a six-hour forecast.
Warning
01
Kelantan · Sungai Kelantan
22.8 m
Rising rapidly
Only 2.2 m until danger
Forecast 23.6 m in 6h (+0.8) · updated 4 min ago
Warning
02
Sarawak · Batang Rajang
18.9 m
Rising
Only 2.1 m until danger
Forecast 19.3 m in 6h (+0.4) · updated 6 min ago
Warning
03
Terengganu · Sungai Dungun
12.1 m
Rising
Only 1.4 m until danger
Forecast 12.7 m in 6h (+0.6) · updated 5 min ago
Alert
04
Kelantan · Sungai Galas
30.6 m
Rising
0.9 m below the warning threshold
Forecast 31.1 m in 6h (+0.5) · updated 8 min ago
Alert
05
Pahang · Sungai Pahang
25.7 m
Rising
1.3 m below the warning threshold
Forecast 26.1 m in 6h (+0.4) · updated 7 min ago
Alert
06
Pahang · Sungai Pahang
14.6 m
Rising
0.9 m below the warning threshold
Forecast 15.0 m in 6h (+0.4) · updated 12 min ago
Alert
07
Terengganu · Sungai Kemaman
11.8 m
Rising
0.9 m below the warning threshold
Forecast 12.2 m in 6h (+0.4) · updated 9 min ago
Alert
08
Sarawak · Batang Rajang
11.9 m
Rising
Approaching the warning threshold
Forecast 12.4 m in 6h (+0.5) · updated 5 min ago
Showing 1–8 of 16 sampled stations — the full JPS network runs 412, but only these publish a live reading.
Illustrative figures — not measurements
River levels, thresholds, forecasts and station counts are illustrative. The Department of Irrigation and Drainage (JPS) publishes live telemetry on publicinfobanjir.water.gov.my as a web page, with no open API — this is the one dataset on the page with no live source.
Did you know
Floods are Malaysia's most frequent natural disaster.
Not earthquakes, not storms. The monsoon arrives on schedule every year; what varies is how much of it falls at once, and on whom.
NADMA; Department of Irrigation and Drainage (JPS)
Fifteen centimetres of moving water can knock an adult over.
Thirty centimetres will float most cars, and sixty will carry away SUVs and trucks. More than half of flood drownings happen in vehicles — which is why the safety advice is four words: turn around, don't drown.
US National Weather Service
A river's danger comes from its catchment, not its length.
Small, steep, paved basins concentrate rain into a flash flood within hours. Vast basins take days to crest — which is why the shortest river on this page is the one that floods most often.
US Geological Survey, flash-flood hydrology
Deep data
06.3
A gauge tells you the water is high; it cannot tell you when the crest arrives. Catchment lag can: the hours between rain landing upstream and the peak reaching the town. Kajang gets four. Sibu gets thirty-eight.
People evacuated
1,284
across 21 relief centres in 7 districts · nobody has died
Deadliest flood
238 deaths
Tropical Storm Greg, Sabah, Dec 1996 · another 102 never found
Costliest flood
RM6.1b
December 2021, DOSM estimate · 0.4% of that year's GDP
Fastest catchment
4 hours
Sungai Langat: rain upstream reaches Kajang the same afternoon
Most flood-prone river
Sungai Klang
shortest major river here, and comes over its bank roughly once a year
Wettest catchment
312 mm
fell upstream of Kuala Krai in 24 hours
Small, steep catchments flash-flood: Sungai Langat drains 389 km² and gives Kajang four hours. The Rajang drains 50,000 km², so Sibu sees the peak a day and a half after the rain that caused it.
| Station | Catchment | Rain upstream | Warning time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kuala Krai | 11,000 km² | 312 mm | 14 h |
| Lubuk Paku | 25,600 km² | 198 mm | 26 h |
| Sibu | 50,000 km² | 164 mm | 38 h |
| Rantau Panjang | 1,652 km² | 121 mm | 9 h |
| Kuala Berang | 2,900 km² | 143 mm | 11 h |
| Kajang | 389 km² | 38 mm | 4 h |
Lag from catchment-mean rainfall to peak stage, from past events.
Length is the textbook fact, discharge is how much water actually moves, and the last column is the one that matters if you live beside it. Read the bottom row: the Klang is the shortest river here, drains the smallest catchment, and carries the least water — and it floods almost every year, because its basin is steep, paved over, and home to eight million people.
| River | States | Length | Basin | Discharge | Floods / decade | Flood-prone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batang Rajang | Sarawak | 563 km | 50,000 km² | 3,600 m³/s | 6 | Frequent |
| Sungai Kinabatangan | Sabah | 560 km | 16,800 km² | 840 m³/s | 5 | Frequent |
| Sungai Pahang | Pahang | 459 km | 29,300 km² | 600 m³/s | 7 | Frequent |
| Sungai Baram | Sarawak | 400 km | 22,100 km² | 1,800 m³/s | 4 | Occasional |
| Sungai Perak | Perak | 400 km | 14,908 km² | 500 m³/s | 3 | Occasional |
| Sungai Muar | Johor, N. Sembilan | 250 km | 6,150 km² | 190 m³/s | 4 | Occasional |
| Sungai Kelantan | Kelantan | 248 km | 13,100 km² | 560 m³/s | 8 | Very frequent |
| Sungai Klang | Selangor, KL | 120 km | 1,288 km² | 50 m³/s | 9 | Very frequent |
Lengths, basins and mean discharges from the published hydrological literature. Not a longest-rivers ranking: several long Bornean rivers (Segama, Lupar, Labuk) are too thinly documented to table. Flood frequency is major floods per decade, from the historical record.
Ranked by confirmed deaths, with today at the bottom for scale. Storm Greg in 1996 killed the most people, December 2021 cost the most money, and December 2014 displaced the most. Duration runs from the first evacuation to the last relief centre closing — the number that decides whether a family misses a week of school and wages, or a month of them. The record reaches further back still: the 1926 Great Flood and 1967's Bah Merah in Kelantan killed dozens to hundreds, but their counts are too uncertain to table.
| Event | States | Deaths | People evacuated | Lasted | Damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1996 | Sabah | 238 | 4,000 | 5 days | RM 0.3b |
| Dec 2021 | Selangor, Pahang | 54 | 71,000 | 14 days | RM 6.1b |
| Jan 1971 | Kuala Lumpur, Selangor | 32 | 38,000 | 10 days | RM 0.2b |
| Dec 2014 – Jan 2015 | Kelantan, Terengganu, Pahang | 21 | 232,000 | 20 days | RM 2.9b |
| Dec 2006 – Jan 2007 | Johor | 18 | 148,000 | 21 days | RM 1.5b |
| Dec 2004 | Kelantan, Terengganu | 11 | 10,000 | 8 days | — |
| Jan 2021 | Pahang, Johor | 8 | 50,000 | 12 days | — |
| Nov 2017 | Penang | 7 | 10,000 | 5 days | RM 0.4b |
| Mar 2023 | Johor | 4 | 45,000 | 9 days | RM 0.3b |
| Dec 2023 | Kelantan, Terengganu | 2 | 26,000 | 13 days | — |
| Today | Kelantan, Terengganu | 0 | 1,284 | 3 days so far | — |
Deaths are confirmed counts; evacuees are the peak documented figure. Damage in billions of ringgit, unadjusted for inflation, shown only where an official or well-documented estimate exists.
Dec 1996
Tropical Storm Greg drove a wall of water and timber through Keningau overnight. Another 102 people were never found.
Dec 2021
Costliest on record: RM6.1 billion (DOSM). Taman Sri Muda sat under four metres of water for days.
Jan 1971
A national disaster declaration — and the Kuala Lumpur Flood Mitigation Project that redrew the city's rivers.
Dec 2014 – Jan 2015
Most people ever displaced. Kuala Krai and Dabong were cut off for days.
River lengths, basin areas and the death tolls of past floods are documented facts. Today's gauge readings, catchment lag figures and the station matrix are illustrative — JPS has no open API.
Air Quality
07
Most of the monitored network sits in the Good band on the US EPA scale. That is worth reading twice: “Good” here still permits PM2.5 above the level the World Health Organization says is safe over 24 hours.
of the monitored city population is breathing Good air right now
US EPA AQI band
Good
Moderate
Unhealthy
| City | US EPA AQI | PM2.5 | Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kuala LumpurKuala Lumpur | 162 | 61 µg/m³ | Unhealthy |
| Petaling JayaSelangor | 162 | 61 µg/m³ | Unhealthy |
| George TownPenang | 65 | 13.6 µg/m³ | Moderate |
| IpohPerak | 69 | 19.7 µg/m³ | Moderate |
| Johor BahruJohor | 158 | 41.1 µg/m³ | Unhealthy |
| KuantanPahang | 115 | 38.9 µg/m³ | Unhealthy |
| Kota BharuKelantan | 71 | 17.3 µg/m³ | Moderate |
| KuchingSarawak | 99 | 44 µg/m³ | Moderate |
| Kota KinabaluSabah | 63 | 19.6 µg/m³ | Moderate |
The vertical rule marks AQI 50 — the boundary between Good and Moderate. PM2.5 is coloured against the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.
Health advice
Air is unhealthy in Kuala Lumpur (AQI 162). Limit prolonged outdoor exertion, and keep windows shut through the afternoon.
CAMS atmospheric composition (ECMWF) via Open-Meteo Air Quality · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Malaysia's own API (DOE) has no open API, so this is the US EPA AQI computed from CAMS concentrations. Bands are close to, but not identical with, DOE's. The 'Good air' share is weighted by the 2020 census population of these nine cities, not the whole country.
Did you know
The WHO halved its PM2.5 guideline in 2021.
The 24-hour limit fell from 25 to 15 µg/m³ and the annual limit from 10 to 5, because the evidence of harm at low concentrations had grown. National indices have largely not followed.
WHO global air quality guidelines (2021)
PM2.5 is small enough to enter the bloodstream.
Under 2.5 micrometres across — about a thirtieth the width of a human hair. It passes the airways entirely, reaches the deepest alveoli, and crosses into the blood.
World Health Organization; US EPA
Air pollution is the largest environmental health risk.
The WHO attributes around seven million premature deaths a year to ambient and household air pollution combined — more than road traffic, malaria and HIV together.
World Health Organization
Deep data
07.3
An air-quality index reports only its worst pollutant and hides the other five. It is also lenient about the one that kills: Kuala Lumpur sits at AQI 162, comfortably inside its band, while its PM2.5 runs at 61 µg/m³ — against a WHO 24-hour guideline of 15.
Dominant pollutant
PM2.5
closest to its WHO guideline in 9 of 9 cities
Above WHO guideline
8 of 9
cities exceed the WHO 24-hour PM2.5 limit of 15 µg/m³
Worst hour
19:00
national AQI peaks at 143 as traffic meets photochemical ozone
Worst month
Jul
3-year mean PM2.5 of 24.1 µg/m³
Cleanest month
Nov
15 µg/m³ · the monsoon rains scrub the sky
Months above WHO
11 of 12
even Malaysia's cleanest month sits at the 15 µg/m³ guideline
All six pollutants behind each city's index. The rule marks the WHO's 24-hour PM2.5 guideline of 15 µg/m³. The last column names the pollutant sitting closest to its own WHO guideline — the one actually driving the number.
| City | PM2.5 vs WHO limit | PM10 | O₃ | NO₂ | SO₂ | CO | Closest to guideline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kuala Lumpur | 61 | 61 | 3 | 80.6 | 34.9 | 3440 | PM2.5 |
| Petaling Jaya | 61 | 61 | 3 | 80.6 | 34.9 | 2394 | PM2.5 |
| George Town | 13.6 | 13.9 | 38 | 19.8 | 5 | 426 | PM2.5 |
| Ipoh | 19.7 | 19.8 | 26 | 11.7 | 4.2 | 529 | PM2.5 |
| Johor Bahru | 41.1 | 44.4 | 40 | 17.7 | 13.6 | 2231 | PM2.5 |
| Kuantan | 38.9 | 40.3 | 41 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 1479 | PM2.5 |
| Kota Bharu | 17.3 | 17.4 | 24 | 8.7 | 5.4 | 401 | PM2.5 |
| Kuching | 44 | 45.2 | 16 | 29.9 | 10.5 | 1049 | PM2.5 |
| Kota Kinabalu | 19.6 | 19.9 | 23 | 8.5 | 3.7 | 1489 | PM2.5 |
PM2.5 and PM10 in µg/m³; ozone, NO₂ and SO₂ in µg/m³; CO in µg/m³. Surface concentrations from CAMS.
The national mean AQI, hour by hour, today. Air is cleanest before dawn and worst in the late afternoon, when the traffic peak meets ozone cooked up by a day of sunlight.
Mean PM2.5 by month across 2023, 2024, 2025, with 2026 to date. The band is the range those years covered. Almost every month of the Malaysian year sits above the WHO guideline.
2026 to date
2023–2025 average
2023–2025 range
Micrograms per cubic metre, averaged over the nine monitored cities. Cells above the WHO's 15 µg/m³ guideline are shaded — which is most of them.
| Month | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Average | 2026 | vs average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 17.1 | 15.9 | 16.8 | 16.6 | 20.1 | +3.5 |
| Feb | 17.6 | 18.2 | 18.8 | 18.2 | 17.7 | −0.5 |
| Mar | 19.9 | 23.4 | 20.7 | 21.3 | 21.7 | +0.4 |
| Apr | 25.5 | 19.5 | 18.5 | 21.2 | 21.9 | +0.7 |
| May | 21.2 | 19.9 | 20.7 | 20.6 | 19.2 | −1.4 |
| Jun | 23.3 | 21.6 | 24.4 | 23.1 | 19.6 | −3.5 |
| Jul | 21.8 | 25.4 | 25.1 | 24.1 | — | — |
| Aug | 21.5 | 20.6 | 22.4 | 21.5 | — | — |
| Sep | 21.9 | 22.1 | 21.5 | 21.8 | — | — |
| Oct | 22.7 | 19.1 | 17.9 | 19.9 | — | — |
| Nov | 15 | 14.8 | 15.1 | 15.0 | — | — |
| Dec | 14.1 | 14.5 | 16.7 | 15.1 | — | — |
CAMS reanalysis. 2026 is blank for months not yet reached.
Exposure weighted by the 2020 census population of these nine cities. This is a city figure, not a national one — most Malaysians live outside a monitored city.
| Band | Share | People |
|---|---|---|
| Good (AQI 0–50) | 0% | 0.00m |
| Moderate (51–100) | 40% | 2.80m |
| Unhealthy (101+) | 60% | 4.16m |
Bands follow the US EPA scale, which is more permissive than the WHO guideline.
CAMS atmospheric composition (ECMWF) via Open-Meteo Air Quality · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Pollutants and AQI are CAMS reanalysis. The monthly PM2.5 climatology covers 2023, 2024, 2025 — CAMS coverage on this endpoint begins mid-2022, so earlier years are excluded rather than averaged from half-years.
Forests
08
The forest is the hinge of everything else on this page. It cools the land, holds the rain back from the rivers, and stores the carbon that warms the air. Malaysia has cleared a great deal of it — though, for the first time, the clearing is slowing.
32%
of Malaysia's tree cover has been lost since 2001 — about 9.5 million hectares. But read that carefully.
What the number does and doesn't mean
That 9.5 Mha is tree cover loss — and it includes oil-palm and timber plantations being harvested and replanted, not only rainforest destroyed forever. The figure that matters for irreplaceable forest is humid primary forest loss: 2.85 million hectares, about 19% of what stood in 2001. Most of it is on Borneo — Sarawak and Sabah account for 56% of the national loss, Sarawak alone for 3.4 Mha.
2.85 Mha
primary rainforest lost
56%
of the loss is on Borneo
~90 Mt
CO₂/yr from peat alone
The rare good line on this page
Primary forest loss peaked around 2016 at some 185,000 hectares a year and has fallen by more than half since — to about 73,000 hectares — helped by no-deforestation commitments from the palm-oil industry and tighter fire control. In 2024 Malaysia dropped out of the world's top ten for tropical primary-forest loss for the first time. The caution: the easiest lowland forest is already gone, and millions of hectares remain earmarked for conversion.
Documented, not a live feed. “Tree cover loss” includes plantation harvest and fire, not only permanent deforestation — the primary-forest figure is the honest measure of rainforest destroyed.
Did you know
“Tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation.”
The headline satellite figure counts every canopy that disappears — including oil-palm and timber plantations being harvested and replanted, and fire. Only a part of it is permanent loss of natural forest. It is the single most misread number in this field.
Global Forest Watch methodology
A drained peat swamp keeps emitting for decades.
Malaysia's peatlands hold centuries of carbon in waterlogged ground. Drain them for plantation and the exposed peat oxidises and burns, releasing carbon long after the trees are gone — which is why peat degradation alone makes Malaysia one of the world's largest peat emitters.
Peer-reviewed peatland studies; WRI
The forest and the flood are the same story.
A bare, logged catchment cannot hold rain the way forest does, so it arrives downstream faster and higher. Logging in the Ulu Muda catchment was tied to the 2022 flash floods that cut water to over 170,000 households.
Mongabay; Department of Irrigation and Drainage
Deep data
08.3
Two credible methods disagree about the biggest driver of Malaysia's deforestation. An honest page shows both rather than picking the convenient one.
By GFW's global model
Oil palm
Commodity-driven clearing — historically oil-palm-dominant — is the largest cause in GFW's classification, with pulp and timber plantations second.
By concession mapping
Timber plantations
Analyses that map permanent loss against concession boundaries attribute the majority — around three-quarters of 2017–2021 deforestation — to industrial timber, especially in Sarawak.
They differ because they measure differently — a global land-use model versus concession-boundary mapping — and over different years. Peatland conversion runs through both. What is not in dispute: the loss is real, it is largely permanent where primary forest is cleared, and it links straight to the floods, the haze and the heat on the rest of this page.
Neither big driver is durian — but the Musang King boom has opened its own front. A hectare of export-grade durian can earn roughly 9 times what oil palm does, with China buying almost all of it, and that maths pushes orchards into forest. The sharpest case: Pahang degazetted about 1,213 hectares of the Hulu Sempan forest reserve — a water catchment and Malayan-tiger corridor — and leased it for durian; Kelantan has approved thousands of acres more around Gua Musang. In the highlands it is vegetables: Cameron Highlands has lost roughly 30% of its forest since 1990, some 5,900 hectares now under farms on slopes that then slide in the monsoon.
Keep the scale honest, though. Set against oil palm and timber these are small — hundreds to thousands of hectares, not millions — and no satellite dataset breaks “durian” out from generic commodity clearing, so they are documented from news, NGO and state records rather than the loss accounting above. What makes them matter is not their area but where they cut: the catchments, the tiger corridors, the steep ground that fails when the trees come off it.
Malaysia pledged at Rio in 1992 to keep at least 50% of its land under forest and tree cover, and officially reports 54.6% today. But that figure counts rubber and oil-palm as “tree cover,” so the share of actual natural forest is lower — and independent analysis warns that land already earmarked for conversion could push the real figure below the pledge. The number is true; what it counts is the argument.
Documented, not a live feed. “Tree cover loss” includes plantation harvest and fire, not only permanent deforestation — the primary-forest figure is the honest measure of rainforest destroyed.
Energy
09
Everything above is what the climate is doing. This is what Malaysia is doing back. Its power still comes mostly from fossil fuels, but it has pledged net zero by 2050 — and it sits under a resource it has barely begun to use.
78%
of Malaysia's electricity is still generated by burning coal and gas. Renewables are almost all hydropower; solar, for all its promise, is barely 4%.
Electricity generation, by source
Coal · 46%
Gas · 32%
Hydro · 18%
Solar & other · 4%
Approximate 2024 generation shares. The two greys are fossil — together about 78% of the grid. The pledge is to invert this: renewables from 31% of installed capacity today to 70% by 2050, and net-zero emissions by 2050.
2050
the year Malaysia has pledged net-zero greenhouse emissions
31%
renewables in the installed-capacity mix — the 2025 target, met on time
70%
renewable capacity by 2050, the long-range target (via 40% in 2035)
45%
cut in emissions intensity vs 2005, pledged by 2030 (Malaysia's NDC)
The Sarawak question
Sarawak is often called green, and its electricity nearly is: mega-dams like Bakun (2,400 MW) give it one of the cleanest grids in Southeast Asia, and it targets net zero by 2050. But a clean grid is not a clean economy. Sarawak is one of the world's largest LNG exporters — the emissions leave in the ships — and among the most deforested places on Earth.
Nor is the hydro itself free of cost. Filling the Bakun reservoir drowned about 700 km² of rainforest — roughly the size of Singapore — and displaced some 10,000 Orang Ulu from their longhouses. “Renewable” and “just” are not the same word, and the gap between a green grid and a green economy is the whole argument.
Solar is the fastest-growing part of the mix, and the reason is overhead all year. The country receives about 1,799 kWh/m² of sun a year — moderate, because cloud takes roughly a quarter of it, and the drier north catches more than the south.
Peak sun hours (kWh/m² per day)
Sunlight through the year
Daily average reaching the ground. February and March are brightest; the northeast monsoon dims the year's end.
| State | Sun per year (kWh/m²) |
|---|---|
| Kelantan5.2 kWh/m²/day · 23% lost to cloud | 1,880 |
| Penang5.1 kWh/m²/day · 23% lost to cloud | 1,850 |
| Terengganu5.1 kWh/m²/day · 24% lost to cloud | 1,846 |
| Perlis5.0 kWh/m²/day · 25% lost to cloud | 1,840 |
| Kedah5.0 kWh/m²/day · 25% lost to cloud | 1,840 |
| Sabah5.0 kWh/m²/day · 28% lost to cloud | 1,821 |
Solar irradiance from NASA POWER satellite climatology (2015–2023), one point per state capital
Solar irradiance is a real satellite-derived measurement. The generation mix, targets, capacity, programme and Sarawak figures are documented from Ember, the Energy Commission, SEDA and Sarawak Energy — real but static, with no open feed. No official count of solar households is published, so none is shown.
Did you know
The equator is not the sunniest place for a solar panel.
Malaysia is bathed in sun but wrapped in cloud, so it receives about 1,800 kWh/m² a year — roughly a quarter less than a clear desert like the Sahara or the Australian outback. The heat that makes it feel tropical is not the same as the light a panel converts.
NASA POWER satellite climatology
Malaysia's roofs could hold ten times today's solar.
The Energy Commission puts the country's rooftop potential at about 42 GW. Total installed solar — rooftops and farms together — is under 6 GW, and solar still supplies only around 2% of the electricity generated.
SEDA MyRER; Energy Commission (Suruhanjaya Tenaga)
A panel's yield is measured in “peak sun hours.”
Malaysia averages roughly 4.9 of them a day — the number of hours of full-strength sun the day's total light adds up to. It is why a rooftop system here typically pays for itself in about five years.
NASA POWER; SEDA
Deep data
09.3
Malaysia's roofs alone could hold about 42 GW of solar; it has installed under 6 across everything — rooftops and farms — and solar still generates only around 2% of the country's electricity. The gap between the sun overhead and the panels beneath it is the whole story.
5.78 GW
solar installed, end of 2025 — farms and rooftops together
1.72 GW
on rooftops — about 4% of the 42 GW they could hold
~2%
of electricity generated — the mix is still gas and coal
42 GW
of rooftop potential sits unused — over ten times today's rooftops
The Large Scale Solar programme auctions capacity in rounds. Each has been bigger than the last — LSS5 and LSS6 together dwarf everything built before them, and most of that capacity is still under construction.
| Round | Year | Capacity awarded |
|---|---|---|
| LSS1 | 2016 | 354 MW |
| LSS2 | 2017 | 465 MW |
| LSS3 | 2019 | 491 MW |
| LSS4 | 2020 | 823 MW |
| LSS5 | 2024 | 1,920 MW |
| LSS6 | 2025 | 1,975 MW |
Awarded capacity per round, MW. Source: Energy Commission (Suruhanjaya Tenaga).
Malaysia's largest solar farms are still going up — the record-holders in Perak and Kedah won't switch on until 2026–2028. The biggest already operating is a floating array on a Kelantan reservoir.
| Plant | Capacity | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Larut & MatangPerak · Solarvest (LSS5+) | 690 MW | Building · 2028 |
| Bukit SelambauKedah · TNB (LSS5) | 500 MW | Building · 2026 |
| Danau Tok UbanKelantan · Cypark | 98 MW | Operating |
| Sungai Petani (floating)Kedah · LSS | 50 MW | Operating |
Documented from developer and Energy Commission announcements. MW is peak capacity.
The scheme changed in 2025: net metering (NEM) closed to new applicants, and Solar ATAP took its place from January 2026. A typical 4–6 kW home system costs RM16,000–24,000 and pays for itself in about 5 years. How many homes have gone solar is not something Malaysia publishes — only the installed capacity, 1.72 GW of rooftops, is on the record.
| Scheme | Status | Who | What it offers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solar ATAP | Current | Households (5–15 kW) & business | Self-use, surplus exported to the grid as a bill offset. 10-year term. Replaced NEM from 1 Jan 2026. |
| SelCo (self-consumption) | Current | Any consumer | Generate and use 100% on-site, nothing exported — no grid credits, no quota. |
| NEM 3.0 | Closed Jun 2025 | Households & business | One-to-one net metering. Closed to new applicants; existing 10-year contracts continue. |
| GITA / GITE | Current (business) | Companies, not homeowners | Green tax allowance on solar capex — a corporate incentive, not a residential one. |
Administered by SEDA; TNB installs the meter and applies the credit. Documented, current mid-2026.
Solar irradiance from NASA POWER satellite climatology (2015–2023), one point per state capital
Solar irradiance is a real satellite-derived measurement. The generation mix, targets, capacity, programme and Sarawak figures are documented from Ember, the Energy Commission, SEDA and Sarawak Energy — real but static, with no open feed. No official count of solar households is published, so none is shown.
Sea Level
10
Heat and floods arrive and pass. The sea only comes in. It is rising a few millimetres a year around Malaysia — imperceptible day to day, decisive over a lifetime — and most of the country's cities, ports and rice sit within a metre or two of the tide.
~4 mm
of sea level rise a year around Malaysia, faster on the west coast (~5) than the east (~3.3). Slow — until you add it up over decades.
How far it could rise by 2100
Malaysia's national water institute, NAHRIM, projects roughly 0.5–1.1 m of rise by 2100, depending on the coast — highest for Sabah and the northern peninsula. The IPCC's global median is a little lower (0.4–0.8m); NAHRIM's figure sits at the high, trend-extrapolated end. Either way, a metre of rise would put about 7,000 km² of land and 180,000 hectares of farmland below the tide, if nothing is built to hold it back.
0.5–1.1 m
NAHRIM, by 2100
7,000 km²
land below a 1 m rise
13%
of coastal land threatened
Not every coast is equal. Ranked by the share of developed land at risk of inundation, the flat, subsiding delta of Batu Pahat in Johor tops the country — nearly all of it — followed by the Klang port coast and the Kedah padi plain. Figures combine sea-level rise with tide, surge and land subsidence, so they read higher than rise alone.
Developed area at risk
| State | Developed area at risk |
|---|---|
| Batu PahatJohor · flat, subsiding delta — nearly all at risk | 100% |
| Port KlangSelangor · busiest port; already floods on high tides | 41% |
| Kuala KedahKedah · padi plain; saltwater already intruding | 39% |
| Kuala TerengganuTerengganu · east-coast river delta | 5% |
| Kota KinabaluSabah · low reclaimed waterfront | 4% |
| KuchingSarawak · peat delta; held by the barrage | 3% |
Documented, not a live feed. Projections are model-dependent ranges, not points. “Areas at risk” combines sea-level rise with tide, surge and subsidence — it is not a pure sea-level map.
Did you know
The sea is not rising evenly.
Winds, currents and the land's own sinking make some coasts rise faster than others. Around Malaysia the west coast is climbing quicker than the east, and reclaimed, subsiding ground like Port Klang feels it worse than the tide gauge alone suggests.
NAHRIM; peer-reviewed tide-gauge and altimetry studies
A slow rise arrives as sudden floods.
Sea level rise is measured in millimetres a year, but it is not felt that way. It is felt when a spring tide, a storm surge and a swollen river coincide on top of a higher baseline — and water reaches streets it never used to.
IPCC AR6, Working Group I
The threat is already in the padi.
Before the coast floods, the salt arrives. Saltwater has pushed into rice fields around Kuala Kedah, where farmers report losing most of a harvest to salinity — a first taste of a coastline moving inland.
Peer-reviewed field studies, Kedah
Deep data
10.3
Sea level rise does not wait for 2100 to be felt. It shows up first as tidal flooding on the busiest port, and as salt in the rice.
Port Klang
already floods on high spring tides — “rob” flooding on Malaysia's busiest port
Kuala Kedah
saltwater has pushed into the padi; farmers report losing most of a harvest to salinity
Kuching Barrage
holds seawater back from a city built low on a peat delta — for now
None of this is a live gauge — it is documented from NAHRIM's national study, from peer-reviewed tide-gauge work, and from field surveys of affected districts. The exact water on an exact street in 2075 is unknowable; the direction is not.
Documented, not a live feed. Projections are model-dependent ranges, not points. “Areas at risk” combines sea-level rise with tide, surge and subsidence — it is not a pure sea-level map.
Map Explorer
11
Switch between six live layers. The whole country repaints — darker means more of whatever you are looking at. Click any state to pin its numbers.
Anomaly vs the 1991–2020 average
Temperature
Did you know
Counts follow area. Densities follow climate.
Shading a map by a raw total mostly maps how big each region is — the oldest error in thematic cartography. It is why this page reports rainfall as percent of normal and heat as an anomaly, not as raw totals a big state would always win.
Monmonier, How to Lie with Maps
A UV index of 11 is “extreme” — the top of the scale.
The Global Solar UV Index was designed by the WHO, WMO, UNEP and ICNIRP as a public warning. Near the equator, midday sun reaches the extreme band routinely rather than exceptionally.
WHO, Global Solar UV Index: A Practical Guide
UV rises about 10% for every 1,000 metres of altitude.
Reflection is the misunderstood part: fresh snow bounces back up to 80% of it — nearly doubling exposure — while dry sand returns only about 15% and open water under 10%. And thin cloud passes most of the ultraviolet through while blocking the warmth that would warn you.
World Health Organization
Deep data
11.3
The map shows one layer at a time, which is how you read a map and how you miss a correlation. The table shows all six together. Kelantan is the wettest and most flood-prone state — and also has the cleanest air and the lowest UV, because the clouds that flood it also shade it.
| State | Temp anomaly | Rainfall | Flood risk* | API | UV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+1.8° | 69% | 44 | 63 | 8.9 | |
+1.5° | 118% | 34 | 69 | 8.8 | |
+1.0° | 68% | 71 | 124 | 8.9 | |
+0.8° | 141% | 24 | 59 | 8.2 | |
+0.8° | 73% | 66 | 115 | 8.9 | |
+0.7° | 127% | 30 | 65 | 7.6 | |
+0.7° | 102% | 22 | 162 | 6.6 | |
+0.6° | 105% | 82 | 71 | 8.5 | |
+0.6° | 66% | 26 | 148 | 7.7 | |
+0.4° | 166% | 28 | 162 | 8.2 | |
+0.4° | 66% | 58 | 158 | 8.3 | |
+0.4° | 42% | 62 | 99 | 9.1 | |
+0.3° | 138% | 18 | 30 | 8.5 | |
+0.1° | 79% | 20 | 153 | 9 |
Sorted by the layer currently selected above. Click a state on the map to pin it. *Flood risk is illustrative — no open feed publishes it.
ERA5 reanalysis (ECMWF / Copernicus) via Open-Meteo · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Temperature anomaly, rainfall and UV are live (Open-Meteo + ERA5 baseline); AQI is CAMS. The flood-risk index is illustrative — JPS publishes no open feed.
Historical Replay
12
Scrub through twenty-one years of Malaysian climate. Watch the baseline drift upward — what counted as an unusually hot year in 2005 is an ordinary one now.
2026
Temperature anomaly
+1.0°C
Rainfall vs normal
81%
2026. Year to date — 188 days measured against the same days' 1991–2020 normal.
Those year-to-year jumps in the line above are not random. Most of them are the Pacific breathing in and out — the El Niño–La Niña cycle, the single biggest driver of Malaysia's rainfall and heat from one year to the next. The warming trend rides on top: an El Niño lands on an already-hotter baseline, which is how a merely moderate one set the 2024 record.
El Niño · hotter & drier
Drought, water rationing, haze
La Niña · wetter & cooler
Swollen monsoons, worse floods
This year
El Niño conditions are strengthening, forecast to peak around November 2026 – January 2027. So the season ahead leans hot and dry, not flooded — and, landing on the warmest baseline yet, METMalaysia has flagged 2026 as a candidate to break the heat record again.
Phase from NOAA Climate Prediction Center and METMalaysia advisories, June 2026. Past impacts from the documented record.
Did you know
The baseline itself moves every ten years.
When the WMO shifted normals from 1961–1990 to 1991–2020, the reference rose with the climate. A day that was “above normal” under the old baseline can be an ordinary day under the new one — without anything about the day changing.
World Meteorological Organization
ERA5 reaches back to 1940.
Eighty-five years of hourly weather, reconstructed from every observation the record holds — ships' logs, balloons, aircraft, satellites — and made physically consistent by a single model.
ECMWF / Copernicus Climate Change Service
El Niño is noise. The trend is the signal.
Individual years leap and dip with the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, which redistributes heat between the ocean and the air. Warming is the slope the leaps happen on, not any one of them.
NOAA; World Meteorological Organization
Deep data
12.3
2016 was the El Niño year that broke thermometers, forced water rationing, and dominated the news. Its anomaly was +1.1°C. That is now cooler than an ordinary year. Nothing about 2016 changed — the ground beneath it did.
Warming since 2005
+0.6°C
2005 was +0.4°C; 2026 is running +1.0°C
Last decade vs the one before
+0.4°C
2016–2025 averaged +0.3°C against 2006–2015's -0.1°C
Warmest years
4 of 5
of the five warmest complete years fall in the last decade
Baseline
26.38°C
the 1991–2020 national mean, from 14 reference points
The mean anomaly of each decade against the 1991–2020 baseline. The last full decade ran three times hotter than the one before it.
| Decade | Mean anomaly | Hottest | Wettest |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–2015 | +-0.07°C | 2010 | 2008 |
| 2016–2025 | +0.30°C | 2016 | 2024 |
2025–2026 is a partial decade, and already the warmest.
Four of the five warmest years in this record have happened since 2023. The famous El Niño of 2016 now ranks fifth, and is falling.
| Rank | Year | Anomaly |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | +0.7°C |
| 2 | 2025 | +0.6°C |
| 3 | 2024 | +0.6°C |
| 4 | 2005 | +0.4°C |
| 5 | 2019 | +0.4°C |
Ranked by annual mean anomaly. 2026 is a year-to-date figure.
ERA5 reanalysis (ECMWF / Copernicus) via Open-Meteo · retrieved 2026-07-08 UTC
Each year's anomaly is the mean daily departure from that day's own 1991–2020 normal, over 14 state reference points. Event notes are documented history, not data.
Daily Archive
13
Each day's national summary is archived — a growing public memory of what Malaysia's climate actually did, day by day.
Temperature
+0.7°C
vs historical average
Rainfall
173%
of normal, last 14 days
Good air
0%
of the population
| Date | Temp anomaly | Rainfall | Good air | Flood risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 October 2026 | +1.3°C | 145% | 0% | Moderate |
| 10 October 2026 | +1.1°C | 162% | 0% | Elevated |
| 9 October 2026 | +1.7°C | 63% | 0% | Low |
| 8 October 2026 | +1.7°C | 77% | 0% | Low |
| 7 October 2026 | +1.8°C | 55% | 0% | Low |
Did you know
One day is weather. Thirty years is climate.
The distinction is not rhetorical — it is the WMO's definition. A single hot day proves nothing on its own, which is exactly why the record has to be kept every day.
World Meteorological Organization
The current normal is already warmer than the one it replaced.
Measuring today against 1991–2020 is a conservative test. Against 1961–1990, the same day would look hotter still.
World Meteorological Organization
A small shift in the average is a large shift in the extremes.
Move the whole distribution a little to the right and the tail moves a lot: records that used to arrive once a decade start arriving every few years. Averages are the least alarming way to state the problem.
IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group I
Deep data
13.3
Any single day can be dismissed. The archive exists so that no one has to argue from memory: here is every day of the last month, and every month of the year so far, in the same units.
Days above average
30 of 30
days in the last month warmer than their own 1991–2020 normal
Hottest day
+2°C
on 2026-09-29, against that day's normal
Wettest day
192%
of normal, on 2026-09-27
Months so far
10
of 2026 measured against the ERA5 baseline
Every day of the last month, measured against that same day's 1991–2020 normal. Not against the annual mean — against the 8th of July, or the 12th of June, as those days behaved across thirty years.
Each month against its own place in the calendar. Rainfall is measured against the normal accumulated over exactly the days observed, so a part-month is still comparable.
| Month | Temp anomaly | Rainfall vs normal |
|---|---|---|
| January | +1.0°C | 41% |
| February | +0.8°C | 113% |
| March | +1.2°C | 38% |
| April | +1.2°C | 72% |
| May | +0.9°C | 106% |
| June | +0.9°C | 114% |
| July | +0.9°C | 103% |
| August | +1.9°C | 53% |
| September | +1.5°C | 101% |
| October | +1.5°C | 86% |
ERA5 reanalysis. The final row is a month-to-date figure.
ERA5 reanalysis (ECMWF / Copernicus) via Open-Meteo · retrieved 2026-10-12 22:43 UTC
Daily anomalies and monthly aggregates are computed against each day's own 1991–2020 normal. Good-air and flood-alert day counts are not available historically and are shown as zero.